Nasscom submitted recommendations to the Supreme Court on the draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Courts, 2026, released on June 3. The industry body requested clearer definitions of key terms such as "high-risk applications" and "substantial risk of harm" to ensure consistent interpretation. The draft rules govern AI use across the Supreme Court, High Courts, subordinate courts, and tribunals, allowing AI for tasks like legal research and transcription but reserving adjudication and sentencing for judges, according to medianama.com.
The Supreme Court’s AI Committee, led by Justice P.S. Narasimha, invited comments on the draft until June 20. Nasscom supported the overall framework but pressed for implementation-level clarity. It specifically asked the Court to provide illustrative guidance on categorising risk profiles and linking them to permissible AI use cases under Regulation 19. Nasscom also urged that technical audits should not require disclosure of source code, aiming to protect proprietary information while maintaining transparency.
The move comes amid growing interest in regulating AI in legal settings, balancing innovation with judicial integrity. The draft rules’ distinction between AI-assisted tasks and judicial functions reflects global trends in AI governance. Clear definitions and risk categorisation are vital to avoid inconsistent application across courts and to foster trust in AI tools. Nasscom’s input highlights the challenges of regulating AI in sensitive domains where outcomes impact legal rights and responsibilities.
The Supreme Court’s AI Committee will consider submissions before finalising the regulations. The draft rules cover AI use in courts nationwide, marking a significant step in formalising AI governance in India’s judiciary, as reported by medianama.com.